<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Magic Buy Button is Just Smoke and Mirrors</title> <atom:link href="http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/</link> <description>#1 Subscribed Ecommerce Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-64184</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-64184</guid> <description>Interesting observation :) the orange was chosen as it was part of our corporate color palette, blue and orange. We haven&#039;t done any button testing on the blog but would be an interesting test!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation <img
src='http://www.getelastic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> the orange was chosen as it was part of our corporate color palette, blue and orange. We haven&#8217;t done any button testing on the blog but would be an interesting test!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Naz</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-64183</link> <dc:creator>Naz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-64183</guid> <description>But isn&#039;t it ironic that this site uses an orange subscribe button? (but yes I agree with the premis of multiple split testing)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t it ironic that this site uses an orange subscribe button? (but yes I agree with the premis of multiple split testing)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15999</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15999</guid> <description>@Susan. Oh boy :-*</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Susan. Oh boy :-*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Susan Petracco</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15997</link> <dc:creator>Susan Petracco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15997</guid> <description>One of my customer recently hired a &quot;landing page optimization&quot; company, who told them to use a red or green add to cart button because those convert the best.
Talk about over-generalizing???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my customer recently hired a &#8220;landing page optimization&#8221; company, who told them to use a red or green add to cart button because those convert the best.</p><p>Talk about over-generalizing???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: electronics_junkie</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15995</link> <dc:creator>electronics_junkie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15995</guid> <description>Match colors.  Make it visible.  Do research on color&#039;s mental effects on people.  Common sense will tell you that there are more factors involved in a person&#039;s decision to buy than the color of your button.  Also, if the button works for another site and not yours, there are factors of that site that affect the decision as well.  It dosen&#039;t matter how close of a match you and your competitor&#039;s sites are.  There might be a small dot in the top right corner that is affecting your page&#039;s cleanness.  Who knows.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Match colors.  Make it visible.  Do research on color&#8217;s mental effects on people.  Common sense will tell you that there are more factors involved in a person&#8217;s decision to buy than the color of your button.  Also, if the button works for another site and not yours, there are factors of that site that affect the decision as well.  It dosen&#8217;t matter how close of a match you and your competitor&#8217;s sites are.  There might be a small dot in the top right corner that is affecting your page&#8217;s cleanness.  Who knows.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Educational Toys</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15993</link> <dc:creator>Educational Toys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:18:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15993</guid> <description>That&#039;s the problem with inexperienced and untested web design. So many factors come into play, into convincing customers to buy. So many people want to take A from Amazon, B from Ebay, C from their top competitor, D from Overstock, etc - and put them all onto their site. But each of those site doesn&#039;t use those features together (otherwise the same company would just say &quot;build me a site that looks like X&quot;). You know?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the problem with inexperienced and untested web design. So many factors come into play, into convincing customers to buy. So many people want to take A from Amazon, B from Ebay, C from their top competitor, D from Overstock, etc &#8211; and put them all onto their site. But each of those site doesn&#8217;t use those features together (otherwise the same company would just say &#8220;build me a site that looks like X&#8221;). You know?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Jennings</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15991</link> <dc:creator>Jon Jennings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:20:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15991</guid> <description>Two things I found interesting...
1) if you Google &quot;Don&#039;t Waste Time and Lost Sales On Split Testing&quot; you find only links to THIS blog - not the original source material.
2) the original source suggests one of those 5 background colors at the top of the page is a secret weapon for converting sales... but then it uses a different color for its own sales panel.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things I found interesting&#8230;</p><p>1) if you Google &#8220;Don&#8217;t Waste Time and Lost Sales On Split Testing&#8221; you find only links to THIS blog &#8211; not the original source material.</p><p>2) the original source suggests one of those 5 background colors at the top of the page is a secret weapon for converting sales&#8230; but then it uses a different color for its own sales panel.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15989</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:46:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15989</guid> <description>@jay
Thanks for stopping by the blog. I may have come across as snarky, but actually this product being sold does not imply that your results may vary. It&#039;s not promoting testing, it&#039;s selling test results.
I can&#039;t read &quot;Don’t Waste Time and Lost Sales On Split Testing - Simply Borrow My Results
Here’s the big idea. You don’t have to waste your time or money split testing. You don’t have to spend months and months before you go to market, or thousands of dollars in PPC advertising like we did to learn what really works. You can simply borrow my results.
I can almost guarantee you simply based on the large scientific numbers that we use to gather the results of these tests you could never gather this information even if you had 8 years and a million dollars to waste trying...&quot;
...without getting a little pissed.  Why? Because this is misleading.
Actually no, he is selling his results and claiming this will save you time and money on testing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jay</p><p>Thanks for stopping by the blog. I may have come across as snarky, but actually this product being sold does not imply that your results may vary. It&#8217;s not promoting testing, it&#8217;s selling test results.</p><p>I can&#8217;t read &#8220;Don’t Waste Time and Lost Sales On Split Testing &#8211; Simply Borrow My Results</p><p> Here’s the big idea. You don’t have to waste your time or money split testing. You don’t have to spend months and months before you go to market, or thousands of dollars in PPC advertising like we did to learn what really works. You can simply borrow my results.</p><p> I can almost guarantee you simply based on the large scientific numbers that we use to gather the results of these tests you could never gather this information even if you had 8 years and a million dollars to waste trying&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>&#8230;without getting a little pissed.  Why? Because this is misleading.</p><p>Actually no, he is selling his results and claiming this will save you time and money on testing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Jennings</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15987</link> <dc:creator>Jon Jennings</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:52:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15987</guid> <description>Haha! Linda, I&#039;ve been reading your blog for long enough to recognize the error here from just the first paragraph and the video opening frame. Thanks for the ecommerce education.
Didn&#039;t one of your interviewees talk about how Amazon tweaked their buy button and all his clients immediately phoned up frothing at the mouth and wanting the same new super button that Amazon had? ...when it turned out Amazon had only tweaked it to allow them an extra line of text somewhere else on the page.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! Linda, I&#8217;ve been reading your blog for long enough to recognize the error here from just the first paragraph and the video opening frame. Thanks for the ecommerce education.</p><p>Didn&#8217;t one of your interviewees talk about how Amazon tweaked their buy button and all his clients immediately phoned up frothing at the mouth and wanting the same new super button that Amazon had? &#8230;when it turned out Amazon had only tweaked it to allow them an extra line of text somewhere else on the page.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arthur Clemens</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/dont-copy-magic-button/comment-page-1/#comment-15985</link> <dc:creator>Arthur Clemens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/?p=2174#comment-15985</guid> <description>The video is pretty thin on evidence how they have conducted the test. If it is true they only tested those 3 other button variations, clearly the big orange button is the winner. Using split testing for this is just bad promotion.
We have recently tested a website that actually uses red buying buttons - conform the styleguide. The test persons did not have any problem with (or remark on) the red buttons. Of course, a usability test is different from quantitative testing, but the test did confirm the article&#039;s conclusion that it all depends on context.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video is pretty thin on evidence how they have conducted the test. If it is true they only tested those 3 other button variations, clearly the big orange button is the winner. Using split testing for this is just bad promotion.</p><p>We have recently tested a website that actually uses red buying buttons &#8211; conform the styleguide. The test persons did not have any problem with (or remark on) the red buttons. Of course, a usability test is different from quantitative testing, but the test did confirm the article&#8217;s conclusion that it all depends on context.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
