Manufacturer Saves Stock-Out Sales With Partner Referrals
Channel conflict can be a concern for brands and manufacturer’s online stores when they essentially compete with their retail partners for sales. But Patagonia takes a co-opetition approach, tying its catalog to its retail partner inventories.
When an item is not in-stock at Patagonia’s online store, Patagonia checks inventory of its resellers and refers customers if it can find the item in-stock:

If it’s possible the item is in-stock at one of Patagonia’s retail stores, the customer is shown the customer service number and offered free ground shipping as a courtesy if the item is available.
When the item cannot be located through a retail partner, the customer is notified:

This also subtly suggests that finding it elsewhere will be difficult. To take this up a notch, adding a link to the product’s category or similar item cross-sells would help convert the disappointed customer.
Patagonia’s approach is win-win-win. When customers can locate products easily, it boosts the likelihood they will buy that item (which is in the manufacturer’s best interest). Also, the customer is likely to come back to Patagonia first next time, knowing that if Patagonia doesn’t have the item in stock they will do their best to find an in-stock item. Retail partners of course benefit from a sale and are more likely to continue to stock the manufacturer’s items.
The service is also available for back-ordered items:

And even for in-stock items, which helps customers who may participate in loyalty programs like Moosejaw Rewards:


Add to del.icio.us
Sphinn It!
Stumble It
This is a great example of how manufacturers can cooperate with retailers selling online. Having to compete with suppliers is a VERY touchy subject with many online retailers. As the market continues to tighten and more manufacturers and distributors look for new methods of generating revenue, many of them that have been “on the fence” about selling directly online are going to dive in with the allure of expanding their revenue channel with lower costs and higher margin. Let this be an example of a solution that might be amicable for both parties.