File this one under “why didn’t I think of that?”
Considering the popularity of both online forums and product reviews, it makes sense that customers ask and answer questions of each other about a product right on the product page. Shoes.com provides Q&A for every product it carries.
To encourage participation, Shoes.com requests it in a post-purchase email. The questions in the email are specific to the product and based on what would be most helpful to a shoe-buyer: “Do they run wide or small?” or “Are these heels formal enough for the prom?”
Like what you're reading?
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Join over 20,000 ecommerce leaders who have subscribed
and receive expert advice about the world of enterprise commerce.
Another shoe site, Shoeline.com has a feedback mechanism called the Return-O-Meter, so prospective buyers can see why people returned an item – it fit short, it fit long etc. But Shoes.com’s approach covers the “long tail” of questions in consumers’ minds – and gives them an outlet to resolve them.
The concern with this type of user-generated product information is what you typically see on blogs and forums – spam comments, comments that are not useful, inflammatory comments about other members and so on. So proceed with caution, and make sure you have a dedicated team member moderating the conversation.
Another caveat is if nobody answers customers’ questions, or the answers are not helpful. Shoes.com has its representatives provide input (indicated with a badge) for most questions. Unfortunately I found several questions while surfing the site that have gone unanswered in over a month.
The big challenge is to get people taking the time to contribute. To encourage repeat participation, Shoes.com could implement a system reward top contributors with gift certificates or a chance at a prize draw, for example.
What do you think are the pros and cons of having social questions and answers?