<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Victorias Secret Lost A $350 Sale</title> <atom:link href="http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/</link> <description>#1 Subscribed Ecommerce Blog</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: brina</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11955</link> <dc:creator>brina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:08:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11955</guid> <description>I have had the entire shopping cart contents of Victorias Secret dissaper, however logging out and logging back in to the site fixes that and makes the cart re-appear.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the entire shopping cart contents of Victorias Secret dissaper, however logging out and logging back in to the site fixes that and makes the cart re-appear.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11953</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:40:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11953</guid> <description>Hi Ravynia, thanks for stopping by our blog.
I agree with you, of course this is the user&#039;s fault. Usability problems often occur because a user doesn&#039;t see something, can figure out how a feature works, doesn&#039;t read instructions, makes assumptions based on experiences with other sites and so on.
This is a scenario to illustrate how making a simple change to your site programming can accommodate customers and maximize/recover sales.  Cart abandonment is one of the biggest pains for ecommerce managers.  What if this could help recover just 2% of abandoned carts, would it be worth it?
Often people are shopping from work on their lunch break and cannot keep all their tabs open, or whatever the reason. Like I mentioned, in my case I expected the items to stay in the cart because other sites had done that for me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ravynia, thanks for stopping by our blog.</p><p>I agree with you, of course this is the user&#8217;s fault. Usability problems often occur because a user doesn&#8217;t see something, can figure out how a feature works, doesn&#8217;t read instructions, makes assumptions based on experiences with other sites and so on.</p><p>This is a scenario to illustrate how making a simple change to your site programming can accommodate customers and maximize/recover sales.  Cart abandonment is one of the biggest pains for ecommerce managers.  What if this could help recover just 2% of abandoned carts, would it be worth it?</p><p>Often people are shopping from work on their lunch break and cannot keep all their tabs open, or whatever the reason. Like I mentioned, in my case I expected the items to stay in the cart because other sites had done that for me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ravynia</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11951</link> <dc:creator>Ravynia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:30:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11951</guid> <description>Why is this Victoria Secrets fault?  Seems to me, you could have taken a break without closing all your windows, or even better yet, simply finish your purchase before you walk away.
VS may have lost a sale, but the reason for their loss was actually not the website, but realistically...  user error.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this Victoria Secrets fault?  Seems to me, you could have taken a break without closing all your windows, or even better yet, simply finish your purchase before you walk away.</p><p>VS may have lost a sale, but the reason for their loss was actually not the website, but realistically&#8230;  user error.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11949</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11949</guid> <description>Hi Ed,
Thanks for pointing out your blog. Subscribed!
That&#039;s an interesting example from ProFlowers...personally I would find the &quot;would a free vase help?&quot; offer desperate and spammy if I was just poking around a site and had no intention to buy. I see big &quot;Pros&quot; and big cons for ProFlowers&#039; approach...risky.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p><p>Thanks for pointing out your blog. Subscribed!</p><p>That&#8217;s an interesting example from ProFlowers&#8230;personally I would find the &#8220;would a free vase help?&#8221; offer desperate and spammy if I was just poking around a site and had no intention to buy. I see big &#8220;Pros&#8221; and big cons for ProFlowers&#8217; approach&#8230;risky.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Henrich</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11947</link> <dc:creator>Ed Henrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11947</guid> <description>Marketers should also consider sending Site Abandonment emails, not just cart abandonment.  See the ProFlowers example in my post at
http://thisweekinetail.blogspot.com/2008/02/site-abandonment-triggered-emails.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marketers should also consider sending Site Abandonment emails, not just cart abandonment.  See the ProFlowers example in my post at</p><p><a
href="http://thisweekinetail.blogspot.com/2008/02/site-abandonment-triggered-emails.html" rel="nofollow">http://thisweekinetail.blogspot.com/2008/02/site-abandonment-triggered-emails.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11945</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:34:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11945</guid> <description>@Jack
If I find an example, I&#039;ll post.
@Jason
Agreed.
@Dmitry
Excellent point. Actually that&#039;s #7 on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketingexperiments.com/improving-website-conversion/shopping-cart-recovery.html#4b&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Marketing Experiments&#039; 10 Cart Recovery Techniques&lt;/a&gt;. Their studies have found 2-3 emails to be optimal but yes, spam is a concern.
Personally, I&#039;ll risk looking like a spammer if I can save some sales. You can&#039;t please everybody. But I&#039;d pay close attention to (and test) subject lines for this type of email.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack</p><p>If I find an example, I&#8217;ll post.</p><p>@Jason</p><p>Agreed.</p><p>@Dmitry</p><p>Excellent point. Actually that&#8217;s #7 on <a
href="http://www.marketingexperiments.com/improving-website-conversion/shopping-cart-recovery.html#4b" rel="nofollow">Marketing Experiments&#8217; 10 Cart Recovery Techniques</a>. Their studies have found 2-3 emails to be optimal but yes, spam is a concern.</p><p>Personally, I&#8217;ll risk looking like a spammer if I can save some sales. You can&#8217;t please everybody. But I&#8217;d pay close attention to (and test) subject lines for this type of email.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmitry Nekrasovski</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11943</link> <dc:creator>Dmitry Nekrasovski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11943</guid> <description>Linda, great post, but I have to emphatically disagree with the recommendation to send, not one, but TWO abandonment reminders.
Users may add products to the cart without intending to check them out for any number of reasons (comparison shopping with other sites, in lieu of using a product comparator, etc)
In these scenarios, an e-commerce retailer can easily antagonize a customer by spamming them with multiple unwanted reminders to return to the cart. And that should be at least as much of a concern as preventing cart abandonment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda, great post, but I have to emphatically disagree with the recommendation to send, not one, but TWO abandonment reminders.</p><p>Users may add products to the cart without intending to check them out for any number of reasons (comparison shopping with other sites, in lieu of using a product comparator, etc)</p><p>In these scenarios, an e-commerce retailer can easily antagonize a customer by spamming them with multiple unwanted reminders to return to the cart. And that should be at least as much of a concern as preventing cart abandonment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Billingsley</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11941</link> <dc:creator>Jason Billingsley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11941</guid> <description>I would definitely test the effect of such a request on conversion. If there is a hit, I would not do it.
People enter their email address prior to the final checkout submit page typically. That is a natural, unobtrusive method.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely test the effect of such a request on conversion. If there is a hit, I would not do it.</p><p>People enter their email address prior to the final checkout submit page typically. That is a natural, unobtrusive method.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack @ The Tech Teapot</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11939</link> <dc:creator>Jack @ The Tech Teapot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:10:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11939</guid> <description>@Linda - Hmm...never been on a site that does that. I suppose some people might believe it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Linda &#8211; Hmm&#8230;never been on a site that does that. I suppose some people might believe it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Linda Bustos</title><link>http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-11937</link> <dc:creator>Linda Bustos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:55:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.getelastic.com/why-victorias-secret-lost-a-350-sale/#comment-11937</guid> <description>@Jack,
When the first item is added to the cart, require an email address (in a popup?) and explain that you are asking &quot;In case there&#039;s a problem.&quot;  The customer can refuse to provide an email address, but just a one-field form that is quick and tells the customer WHY you&#039;re asking is not too obtrusive, and you can ask for more information in the actual checkout process.
Thoughts?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jack,</p><p>When the first item is added to the cart, require an email address (in a popup?) and explain that you are asking &#8220;In case there&#8217;s a problem.&#8221;  The customer can refuse to provide an email address, but just a one-field form that is quick and tells the customer WHY you&#8217;re asking is not too obtrusive, and you can ask for more information in the actual checkout process.</p><p>Thoughts?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
